 |
In
Praise of the Buying Cycle
An
Exercise in Customer Retention
Lifetime
Customer Value Drives Budgets
Building
the Marketing Budget
Strategic
Public Relations
Loyalty
Programs
Chief
Marketing Technologists
Marrying
Marketing and IT
The
Mechanics of Marketing
The
True Measure of Marketing
Customer
Retention Strategies in Action
Customer Retention Strategies
Hidden
Obstacles to a Successful Strategy
The
Process of Marketing Process
A
Marketing Education
ROI
Is No USP
On
the Web, Everyone Can Hear You Lie
What
Do Your Customers Want? Don't Ask Them
Branding
Schmanding
Wrong
Market. Wrong Time
When
Branding Doesn't Work
Aligning
Collateral to the Buying Cycle
Positioning
for B2B
Strategic
Pricing
|
 |
| |
LIFETIME
CUSTOMER VALUE DRIVES MARKETING BUDGETS
This is Jane.
She's my average customer.
I've never met her. It's impossible for me to be able to get to
know her. I can't think of even a minor business reason why I should.
I don't know where she lives. I don't know what she does. I don't
know if she's bright or dull as a drip faucet.
Yet, I base my entire marketing budget, and the metrics I use to
evaluate how effectively I'm using that budget, entirely on Jane.
Let me tell you
what I do know about Jane.
Jane
spends $50 a month with me. She'll stay with me for 1.92 years.
And she'll spend $1154 with me over that lifetime.
That will eventually become a net lifetime contribution of $543.
On average, 3,200
Janes buy from me each year.
JANE
DRIVES BUDGETSJANE DRIVES METRICS
With that information in hand, I know all I need to know to both
develop a well-grounded and realistic marketing budget, and to measure
the effectiveness of my marketing programs at the same time.
I know her lifetime value as a customer.
I spend company money to achieve the three primary
marketing goals of acquiring new customers just like Jane, getting
Jane to buy more, and getting Jane to stay a customer for a longer
period of time. And when the spreadsheets come out and the yearly
Marketing Budget Bash commences, I'm always asked two questions.
And I always let Jane answer for me.
What's
the basis for this budget?
Jane says she
knows exactly what we should spend to acquire, grow and retain hershe
doesn't need to know what P&G or any other company spends. Jane
looks at her net lifetime contribution and tells us that we could
spend close to $2,000,000 a year on it without losing money. We
allocate 70% of that to Sales and Marketing. These two groups do
a 50/50 split and each ends up with about $700,000 for the year.
How will you know if it's working?
Jane says there
are three simple metrics. How many of her I have; how much she's
spending each month; and how long she's spending with us. The first
two we can measure within a few months. The last, of course takes
longer. So we profile her again and again. If Jane's doing more
of those things, our marketing is working. If she's not, neither
is it.
A SOLID FOUNDATION FOR BUDGET AND MEASUREMENT
What we've done with Jane is used her lifetime customer
value as the basis for establishing our budget. And we've taken
the same criteria we used to determine lifetime value, and made
them the core of our effective-marketing measurements.
Our point of focus is Jane. Our interests specific. Our results
clearly measurable.
Lifetime customer value meets what I consider to be the
three primary criteria of any budgeting methodology:
 |
It
relies on a set of objective metricsyour metricsand
not industry averages, or best practices, or prolonged trial-and-error |
 |
It
comes from objective information that is easy to find. |
 |
And it provides not just the budget basis, but the basis for
the metrics to measure marketing effectiveness. |
No formula is either
perfect or universal. But I thinkpoint for pointusing
average lifetime customer value to establish a concrete foundation
for your company]'s marketing budget may very well make good common
and financial sense.
Want to
weigh in? Click here to tell
us what you think.
Want to receive these articles by email on the second and fourth Tuesday
of every month? Give us your information here:
|
| |
|
|